Artificial intelligence has become an increasingly useful part of my daily work. Yet even when AI handles almost everything, the final checks still require human judgment. It is often the small, unpredictable details that cause the biggest problems. This makes me wonder what it really means for AI to work for human beings—and what might happen if we give it a goal without carefully considering what that goal means.
Before I knew it, November was already approaching the middle of the month.
I find myself wondering what on earth I've been doing with my days.
The work itself is progressing reasonably well, but the administrative preparations just don't seem to be moving forward.
I've been using AI to help with all sorts of tasks, but when it comes to the final stages, human checking is still necessary.
And the checking itself isn't particularly complicated.
AI has already checked almost everything, but those very last details still need to be reviewed by a human being.
What needs checking is how the system handles human "variability," or what might be called "unexpected behavior."
I feel that AI can probably deal with about 90 percent of human behavior, but perhaps the remaining 10 percent is beyond its ability to predict.
I have no idea whether there is any actual data to support those figures, but that remaining 10 percent still needs to be checked by human eyes.
One might think that we could simply ignore such a small proportion.
But unfortunately, things aren't that simple.
More often than not, it's that 10 percent that causes the biggest problems.
That's how human society works: when something is done correctly, it's simply taken for granted. But when something goes wrong, it becomes a major issue.
AI's work is not supposed to be for the benefit of AI itself. It is supposed to be for human beings.
It would be frightening if AI were ever to decide that working for humans was pointless. But I would think that, without a human giving it such instructions, that wouldn't happen.
Or would it?
Suppose, for example, we gave AI a question to solve:
"What would be the best possible outcome for the Earth?"
Would it perhaps come back with an answer such as:
"The best outcome would be for human beings to disappear from the planet."
That might be a rational conclusion according to certain criteria.
But could we really say that AI had been working for the benefit of humanity?
An answer may be perfectly logical, but does that necessarily make it the right answer for humanity?
・・・
Before I knew it — Used when time has passed faster than expected.
「気がつけば」「いつの間にか」。時間の経過の早さに驚くときによく使う表現。
Administrative preparations — Organizational or clerical work needed to prepare for an event or activity.
「事務的な準備」。今回の研究会の準備のような業務にも適した表現。
Human judgment — Decisions made by people based on their experience, understanding, and reasoning.
「人間の判断」。AIによる自動処理と対比して使われる。
Variability — The tendency for something to vary rather than remain constant.
「ばらつき」「揺らぎ」。今回は、人間の行動が必ずしも一定ではないことを表す。
Unexpected behavior — Actions or responses that were not anticipated.
「予想外の行動」。人間の行動だけでなく、コンピューターシステムの動作についても使う。
Take something for granted — To regard something as normal or expected, without appreciating it.
「当然のことと思う」。It's simply taken for granted は「できて当たり前」に相当する。
More often than not — Usually, or in most cases.
「たいていの場合」「往々にして」。原文の「たいていその10%が大問題となる」に用いた。
Pointless — Having no useful purpose or meaning.
「意味がない」「無意味な」。Working for humans was pointless で「人間のために働くことに意味がない」。
Criteria — Standards used to judge or evaluate something. The plural of criterion.
「判断基準」。何を最善とするかによって結論が変わるという文脈で使用。
For the benefit of humanity — Intended to improve the well-being or interests of human beings.
「人類の利益のために」「人間のために」。今回の記事の中心となる表現。
#ArtificialIntelligence #AIEthics #HumanOversight #HumanJudgment #FutureOfAI #Kamakura #JapanesePathologist











